[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467E3BA8.4050505@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:38:48 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, "david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bunk@...sta.de; Duncan Sands" <duncan.sands@...h.u-psud.fr>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: multithreaded probing - more parallelism
control
Greg KH wrote:
> I'm still not convinced that we need to add this kind of complexity to
> the driver core, instead of just letting the individual driver
> subsystems do this, if they want to do it.
>
> Especially as no subsystem wants to do this today :)
Yes, it should first be shown (with subsystem conversions and runtime
tests with, say, at least two different bus architectures) that features
like this really are appropriately implemented as a driver core abstraction.
I would lend a hand to put this to test, but I won't do this anymore
with the old ieee1394 subsystem, and work on the new firewire subsystem
will be focused on stabilization and feature completion in the short to
mid term.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists