[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706241122030.27778@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:24:16 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@....atmel.com>,
ARM Linux Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 07:39:33PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > I'm quite happy with this approach for 2.6.23-rc, along with your ARM
> > dma_map patch which (if I understood aright) rmk approved.
>
> I didn't approve it. Please re-read my reply - there are still some
> unanswered questions in it which _really_ need answering.
Sorry for misrepresenting you.
> The report talks about the AT91 machines. These machines do not have
> cache coherent DMA. Therefore, the code being patched should be
> optimised away by the compiler. *Or* we have even bigger problems.
>
> Please forward the original problem report.
Done.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists