[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070625124750.GB44019@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:47:50 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Tomasz K?oczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:40:23PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 25 2007 14:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> It was started in time when most cheap sound cards was without hw mixer.
> >> And .. when today you use ALSA on sound card without hw mixer still all
> >> this (past ?) problems are actual.
> >
> >Huh? I have no problems with soft mixing...
>
> Diverging from the discussion, how is soft mixing actually done? If it was done
> in userspace, it would need shared memory, or a back relay from kernelspace to
> userspace (and back again for the final output), otherwise I could not imagine
> how all alsa streams came together at one point.
SysV shared memory and semaphores, done in the alsa lib.
Yes, your kernel sound access library does shared mem, semaphores,
fork+exec and friends.
Back relay and virtual devices is the way it should have been done.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists