[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070625132107.GD1094@stusta.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:21:07 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Tomasz K?oczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > So, do you mean the soft-mixing is the biggest issue? That's just a
> > part of a design issue, and if we want to go to that way, the
> > impelemtation would be trivial, regardless on ALSA or not. Totally
> > irrelevant argument regarding "remove ALSA".
>
> Soft mixing is actually the biggest issue because if you had
> generalized soft-mixing in the kernel-visible audio ports[1] you would
> win two things:
>
> - programs could use the OSS API without interfering with the ALSA one
> or which each other
This works with aoss.
If people often run into this problem it might make sense to deprecate
the in-kernel OSS emulation and point people to the userspace emulation
instead?
> - programs coult use the ALSA kernel API directly without interfering
> either, which would allow alternative libalsa implementations for
> those who hate the current one
>...
Allowing for some hypothetical implementation noone might ever write is
not sucha strong point...
> OG.
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists