| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:37:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up Hi, On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several > related things: > > 1. split linux/elf.h into pieces > > This splits linux/elf.h into several pieces: > linux/elf.h - still the common elf header, > functionally unchanged > linux/elf-const.h - ELF constants, includable by asm code We have the __ASSEMBLY__ define for this, so just for asm code we don't need a separate header. > linux/elf-decl.h - ELF type declarations, without definitions > linux/elf-defn.h - ELF type definitions What's the point in splitting these two? After this patch <linux/elf.h> seems to be pretty much empty, I'd rather suggest to move the function declarations to elfcore.h and leave the basic elf definitions in elf.h. Many small header files have the disadvantage that it takes longer to find the needed information. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists