[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182788561.6174.70.camel@lappy>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:22:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Roy Huang <royhuang9@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubreylee@...il.com>, riel@...hat
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm-controller
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
> use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
> database application using direct IO, backup applications and
> streaming applications that does not make good use of pagecache.
I'm aware that some people want this. However we rejected adding a
pagecache limit to the kernel proper on grounds that reclaim should do a
better job.
And now we're sneaking it in the backdoor.
If we're going to do this, get it in the kernel proper first.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists