[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:41:08 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: david@...g.hm
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>, rae l <crquan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -Os versus -O2
On 06/25/2007 03:33 AM, david@...g.hm wrote:
> is the list of what's included in -O2 vs -Os different for different
> CPU's? what about within a single family of processors? (even in the x86
> family the costs of jumps, loops, and cache misses varies drasticly)
At least not in the example Duron/Athlon case. Both -march=athlon{,-4) but
64K versus 256K L2 which I'd expect to be an important difference in the -Os
versus -O2 behaviour.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists