[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070625151411.GB1018@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:14:11 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@...e.de>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>, jjohansen@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
Hi!
> We've been over the "AA is different" discussion in threads about a
> billion times, and at the last kernel summit. I think Lars and others
> have done a pretty good job of describing the problems they are trying
> to solve, can we please move on to discussing technical issues around
> that?
Actually, I surprised Lars a lot by telling him ln /etc/shadow /tmp/
allows any user to make AA ineffective on large part of systems -- in
internal discussion. (It is not actually a _bug_, but it is certainly
unexpected).
(Does it surprise you, too? I'm pretty sure it would surprise many users).
James summarized it nicely:
# The design of the AppArmor is based on _appearing simple_, but at the
# expense of completeness and thus correctness.
If even Lars can be surprised by AAs behaviour, I do not think we can
say "AA is different". I'm afraid that AA is trap for users. It
appears simple, and mostly does what it is told, but does not do _what
user wants_.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists