| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <46802649.9000403@opensound.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:32:09 +0300 From: Hannu Savolainen <hannu@...nsound.com> To: Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl> CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ? Tomasz Kłoczko kirjoitti: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> >> On Jun 24 2007 21:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >>> Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical >>> arguments. >> >> Ok: The OSS cs46xx driver did not support the rear 2 channels. The cs46xx OSS driver in the kernel is not our work. This discussion is about _our_ OSS 4.0 so the above is not a valid argument. > Yes it is true .. OSS (Hannu tree) dos not provide rear 2 channels in > cs46xx driver because .. in this OSS tree there is no cs46xx driver :> The driver for cs46xx/cs4280 devices in OSS 4.0 is called cs4280.c. It's based on the same sample sources from Crystal than the kernel cs46xx one. It doesn't support the rear channels any better which could be an argument. However OSS is now an open source community project so anybody has freedom to fix this problem. Best regards, Hannu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists