linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706252236.41004.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:36:40 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	eranian@....hp.com
Cc:	b.steinbrink@....de, ingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	levon@...ementarian.org, perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, wcohen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog


> I looked at the code I have in my tree coming from Bjon's patches and
> I am a bit confused by the flow for probing as well.

Yes, it's a little risky. Perhaps it's better to readd the separate CPU switch
from .21 there again for 2.6.22. Ugly, but should be safe

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/