linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46802A98.4030407@imap.cc>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:50:32 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues

Am 25.06.2007 19:06 schrieb Steven Rostedt:
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 18:50 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> The Siemens Gigaset ISDN base driver uses tasklets in its isochronous
>> data paths. [...]
>> Does that qualify as performance sensitive for the purpose of this
>> discussion?
> 
> Actually, no.  16ms, even 8ms is an incredible amount of time. Unless
> you have a thread that is running at a higher priority than the thread
> that handles the work queue performing the task, you would have no
> problems making that deadline.

Ok, I'm reassured. I'll look into converting these to a work queue
then, although I can't promise when I'll get around to it.

In fact, if these timing requirements are so easy to meet, perhaps
it doesn't even need its own work queue, and just making each
tasklet into a work item and queueing them to the global queue
with schedule_work() would do? Or am I getting too reckless now?

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (254 bytes)