[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706260027.02396.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:27:01 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Prevent frozen user mode helpers from failing the freezing of tasks (rev. 2)
On Monday, 25 June 2007 23:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > [I hope the ACKs still apply.]
>
> Uhuh, not 100% sure.
>
> > +static int usermodehelper_disabled;
> > +
>
>
> ...
>
> > case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> > case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> > usermodehelper_disabled = 1;
> > - return NOTIFY_OK;
> > + smp_mb();
>
> usermodehelper_disabled should be atomic variable, too, so we don't
> have to play these ugly tricks by hand? This should not be
> performance-critical, right?
Well, I think we'd need to add the barriers anyway.
The problem, as far as I understand it, is that the instructions can get
reordered if there are no barriers in there.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists