[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467F492B.6000002@vc.cvut.cz>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:48:43 -0700
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
CC: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morgan <agm@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
James Morris wrote:
> Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security
> module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the
> overall security architecture.
Hello,
> -module_param(debug, bool, 0600);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug enabled or not");
> +static int __init root_plug_debug(char *str)
> +{
> + debug = simple_strtol(str, NULL, 0);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("root_plug_debug=", root_plug_debug);
is this necessary? What about just documenting
root_plug.{vendor_id,product_id,debug}, so it won't break existing
root_plug users (if there are any) ? I thought that typed
module_param() is prefered over untyped __setup()...
Thanks,
Petr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists