[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182854798.16516.5.camel@work>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:46:38 +0100
From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kay.sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Bryn M. Reeves" <breeves@...hat.com>, John Lenz <lenz@...wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [patch] Move led attributes out of device name and into sysfs
attributes, was Re: LED devices
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:02 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> There were some other opinions voiced including one from the person
> who started this discussion.
>
> So no, the people who write the tools that parse sysfs (like HAL.)
> don't appreciate this.
>
> People who write tools that parse sysfs like shell scripts don't
> appreciate it either, as I illustrated.
>>From a hal point of view, we don't care if the device name is 'led01' or
'light_to_dance_the_fandango' and from a shell point of view it's
probably best for the latter. I think the point Greg tried to make is
that it shouldn't matter, and HAL shouldn't export (nor parse) the
device name as anything sensible.
> You've yet to give any technical reason why we can't have meaningful
> busids rather than random numbers. Your entire argument seems to be
> that its wrong because its a bit different and nobody else does it...
If it's a trivial name then I think led_thinklight0 is perfectly okay, I
think Kay was talking more about the attribute vs. name-in-device
encoding.
Richard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists