linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86_84: move iommu declaration from proto to iommu.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:43:27 -0400
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86_84: move iommu declaration from proto to iommu.h

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:49:26PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> [PATCH 2/2] x86_84: move iommu declaration from proto to iommu.h

Sorry for the hassle, but this patch should come first and then your
current first patch becomes much simpler and does not touch proto.h
needlessly.

Also, I still think an iommu_ops is a better approach. I'll put
something together when I add the Calgary shutdown bits next week
after OLS.

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/