linux-kernel - Re: [NETFILTER] early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46811442.5070308@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:27:30 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v3)

Vasily Averin wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> I don't like the NF_CT_PER_BUCKET constant. First of all, each
>> conntrack is hashed twice, so its really only 1/2 of the average
>> conntracks per bucket. Secondly, its only a default and many
>> people use nf_conntrack_max = nf_conntrack_htable_size / 2, so
>> using this constant for early_drop seems wrong.
>>     
>> Perhaps make it 2 * nf_conntrack_max / nf_conntrack_htable_size
>> or even add a nf_conntrack_eviction_range sysctl.
>>     
>
> IMHO The number of conntracks checked in early_drop() have following restrictions:
> - it should be not too low -- to decrease chances of transmission failures,
> - it should be limited by some reasonable value -- to prevent long check delays.

Agreed.

> Also I believe it makes sense to have it constant (how about NF_CT_EVICTION
> name?) -- to have the same behaviour on various nodes. However I doubt strongly
> that anybody will want to change this value. Do you think it is really required?
>   

I don't know. The current behaviour will on average scan 16 entries.
For people manually tuning their hash to saner settings it will scan
a single entry. So we have a quite wide range of values already.
The single entry with sane hash settings is too little IMO, maybe use
some middle-ground, make it 8 by default as you did and rename the
constant. NF_CT_EVICTION_RANGE sounds fine.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/