[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46813E0F.1060806@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:25:51 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:15:05AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> Also the user interface for X server case needs more work.
>>>
>> actually with the mode setting of X moving into the kernel... X won't
>> use /dev/mem anymore at all
>
> We'll see if that happens. It has been talked about forever,
> but results are sparse.
jbarnes posted the code a few weeks ago.
>
>> (and I think it mostly already doesn't even without that)
>
> It uses /sys/bus/pci/* which is not any better as seen from the IOMMU.
>
> Any interface will need to be explicit because user space needs to know which
> DMA addresses to put into the hardware. It's not enough to just transparently
> translate the mappings.
that's what DRM is used for nowadays...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists