[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182877164.1437.49.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:59:24 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch, v2.6.22-rc6] sys_time() speedup
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 16:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >Subject: [patch] sys_time() speedup
> > >From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > >
> > >improve performance of sys_time(). sys_time() returns time in seconds,
> > >but it does so by calling do_gettimeofday() and then returning the
> > >tv_sec portion of the GTOD time. But the data structure "xtime", which
> > >is updated by every timer/scheduler tick, already offers HZ granularity
> > >time.
> >
> > How well synchronized is xtime with real-time ?
>
> it's updated by every jiffy.
Well, NTP_INTERVAL_LENGTH to be specific which is every jiffie with one
exception: With dynticks this is a bit more complicated, and xtime is
updated only twice a second.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists