linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA support.

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Nish Aravamudan wrote:

> > No. alloc_pages follows memory policy. alloc_pages_node does not. One of
> > the reasons that I want a new memory policy layer are these kinds of
> > strange uses.
> 
> What would break by changing, in alloc_pages_node()
> 
>        if (nid < 0)
>                nid = numa_node_id();
> 
> to
> 
>        if (nid < 0)
>                return alloc_pages_current(gfp_mask, order);
> 
> beyond needing to make alloc_pages_current() defined if !NUMA too.

It would make alloc_pages_node obey memory policies instead of only
following cpuset constraints. An a memory policy may redirect the 
allocation from the local node ;-).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/