[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ork5tq1lbk.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:02:07 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@....ic.unicamp.br>
To: davids@...master.com
Cc: "Linux-Kernel\@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 26, 2007, "David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva:
>> On Jun 26, 2007, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> wrote:
>> > I read your scenario of the vendor not giving you the source to
>> > mean: not directly; i.e. they could give you a third-party
>> > download link.
>> This has never been enough to comply with GPLv2.
> A lot of people seem to say this, but I don't think it's true.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCUnchangedJustBinary and
the 3 questions after that should be enlightening as to why people say
this ;-)
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
^^^^^^^^^^
Why would 'physically' be there if it didn't mean anything? When
interpreting legal texts, that's one sort of question you should ask
yourself.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists