[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070625171404.4717ed48.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:14:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 10/28] highres: Improve debug output
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:32:35 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> if (!dev || !(dev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT) ||
> - !tick_device_is_functional(dev))
> + !tick_device_is_functional(dev)) {
> +
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Clockevents: "
> + "could not switch to one-shot mode:");
> + if (!dev) {
> + printk(" no tick device\n");
> + } else {
> + if (!tick_device_is_functional(dev))
> + printk(" %s is not functional.\n", dev->name);
> + else if (!(dev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT))
> + printk(" %s does not support one-shot mode.\n",
> + dev->name);
> + }
There is a logic path through here where the printk doesn't get its \n
termination? And it will fail to print the reason for the failure, too.
Maybe that's a can't-happen, in which case the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT test
is superfluous?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists