linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: preparation for raid acceleration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070627.005416.43852201.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dan.j.williams@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	christopher.leech@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: preparation for raid acceleration

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:17:49 -0700

> Hello David,
> 
> The following two patches are part of the raid acceleration series I
> would like to push for 2.6.23 consideration.  I am sending these two
> separately for your review for the following reasons: the 'dmaengine'
> core initially came in through netdev,  patch #2 makes changes to
> net/dev/core.c, and lastly I have an ack on the raid changes but no ack
> from the community on the i/oat and dmaengine changes.
> 
>       dmaengine: add base support for the async_tx api
>       dmaengine: move channel management to the client

Dan, you can merge this through Andrew's -mm tree and this
will actually make things easier for me.  The net changes
are minimal and I have no problem with them.

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/