[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070627004116.GL21478@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:41:16 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Derek M Jones <derek@...sof.co.uk>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 01:29:59AM +0100, Derek M Jones wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> >>>Hopefully correct handling of integer constant expressions. Please,
> >>>review.
> >>Am I invoking sparse wrongly? ./sparse -W -Wall doesn't diagnose
> >>the following TU, for example.
> >>
> >>extern int a;
> >>extern int as1[(a = 2)];
> >
> >sparse simply doesn't check that. We don't have anything resembling
> >support of VLA.
>
> If it did support VLAs it would point out that this is
> a constraint violation. VLAs must have block or function
> prototype scope.
I know. It's just that "let's do something about array size checks"
triggers "yeah, but the poor sod who does that will have to sort
VLAs *and* gcc extensions around VLAs out", which is not a nice thought
and so far nobody had touched that area at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists