lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46822540.2010004@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:52:16 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Subject: Re: [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v4)

Vasily Averin wrote:
> When the number of conntracks is reached nf_conntrack_max limit, early_drop()
> tries to free one of already used conntracks. If it does not find any conntracks
> that may be freed, it leads to transmission errors.
> In current implementation the conntracks are searched in one hash bucket only.
> It have some drawbacks: if used hash bucket is empty we have not any chances to
> find something. On the other hand the hash bucket can contain a huge number of
> conntracks and its check can last a long time.
> The proposed patch limits the number of checked conntracks and allows to search
> conntracks in other hash buckets. As result in any case the search will have the
> same chances to free one of the conntracks and the check will not lead to long
> delays.


Thanks Vasily. I have some patches queued to convert all conntrack
hashes to hlists, which conflict with your patches. They need a bit
more work, I'll integrate your changes on top of them once I'm done.

BTW, I played around with your last patch yesterday and it shows
a big improvement when flooding the machine with new connections.
Previously about 5% of the (valid) new connections would get
dropped, with your patch not a single one :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ