[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070627122628.GR7590@daikokuya.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:26:28 +0900
From: Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
Al Viro wrote:-
> Egads... After rereading that... What a mess.
>
> int foo(void)
> {
> static int a[1][0,2];
> }
>
> is, AFAICS, allowed. Reason:
> int a[0,2]
> is a VLA due to 6.7.5.2[4] (0,2 is not an ICE). However, due to the language
> in the same section,
> int a[1][0,2]
> is *not* a VLA, since (a) 2 is an ICE and (b) its element type "has a known
> constant size" (it does - the value of 0,2 is certainly guaranteed to be 2).
> I.e., it's VM type, but not a VLA. I.e. only the first part of 6.7.5.2[2]
> applies and we are actually fine.
>
> So we can have a static single-element array of int [0,2], but
> not a plain static int [0,2]. Lovely, that...
DR 312 clarified the meaning of "known constant size"
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_312.htm
in the sensible way, thankfully, so your example is actually invalid.
Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists