[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070627153258.50d5dac3@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:32:58 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: pci.h stubs (was: EDD build error)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:03:05 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 02:55:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:30:48 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> > > pci_get_bus_and_slot() shouldn't be used because it fails to work on
> > > systems with multiple domains. pci_get_slot() avoids this problem (and
> > > is much faster too).
> >
> > But requires you have a bus pointer to hand which is often not the
> > case. Do we need pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() ?
>
> We have pci_find_bus(domain, busnr) which will get you the bus pointer.
So the answer is "yes" we should then, and move from pci_get_bus_and_slot
to pci_get_bus_domain_and_slot() [or just add an argument]. The point of
the functions is to be easy to use, so it should be handled internally.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists