[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182955818.8970.28.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:50:18 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:18 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> --- a/expand.c
> +++ b/expand.c
[...]
> @@ -488,12 +490,15 @@ static int expand_conditional(struct expression *expr)
>
> cond_cost = expand_expression(cond);
> if (cond->type == EXPR_VALUE) {
> + unsigned flags = expr->flags;
> if (!cond->value)
> true = false;
> if (!true)
> true = cond;
> + cost = expand_expression(*true);
> *expr = *true;
> - return expand_expression(expr);
> + expr->flags = flags;
> + return cost;
This passes an incorrect type to expand_expression; it wants a struct
expression *, but *true has type struct expression; did you want to pass
true rather than *true?
- Josh Triplett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists