| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706271159001.4668@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:59:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> To: Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de> cc: mrmacman_g4@....com, bunk@...sta.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, david@...g.hm Subject: Re: Linux Kernel include files On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote: > > > That's a good point I missed. > > > > What about: > > > > #if defined(__GNUC__) && __STDC_VERSION__ < 19901L > > __extension__ typedef signed long long __s64; > > __extension__ typedef unsigned long long __u64; > > #else > > typedef signed long long __s64; > > typedef unsigned long long __u64; > > #endif > > What about using: > > #if (defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__SUNPRO_C)) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) > > Well, there seems to be one other compiler (the one from Intel). > It may be that if this compiler does not claim to be GCC, another > definituion needs to be added. the intel compiler does indeed claim to be gcc. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists