linux-kernel - Re: Question about fair schedulers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <4682C865.7080307@tmr.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:28:21 -0400
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject:  Re: Question about fair schedulers

Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007, Tom Spink wrote:
>> Alberto,
>>
>> If you're feeling adventurous, grab the latest kernel and patch it
>> with Ingo's scheduler: CFS.
>>
>> You may be pleasantly surprised.
> 
> Thanks, I might if I have to courage to patch and compile my own kernel :)
> 
> However, I'd also need to change all my applications to set them with the 
> right priority to see the good results, so I think I might just wait until it 
> lands in mainline.

In general not the case. I generally don't diddle my priorities, there's 
rarely a need.
> 
> Just to check if I understood everything correctly:
> 
> The mainline scheduler tries to be smart and guess the priority of each task, 
> and while it mostly hits the nail right in the head, sometimes it hits you 
> right in the thumb.
> 
> Fair schedulers, on the contrary, forget about trying to be smart and just 
> care about being fair, leaving the priority settings to where they belong: 
> applications.
> 
> Is this more or less correct?

Incomplete. The CFS scheduler seems to do better with latency, so you 
may get less CPU to a process but it doesn't wind up waiting a long time 
to get a fair share. So it "feels better" without micro tuning.

Face it, if you have more jobs than CPU no scheduler is going to make 
you really happy.
> 
> Alberto.
> 


-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/