[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070627203258.GE4344@rhun.congress.lan>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:32:58 -0400
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: change _map_single to static in pci_gart.c etc
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 01:29:46PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> >On Wednesday 27 June 2007 22:25:11 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> On 6/27/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 19:41:21 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> > > [PATCH] x86_64: change _map_single to static in pci_gart.c etc
> >> > >
> >> > > there function is called via dma_ops->.., so change it to static
> >> >
> >> > Actually all these functions shouldn't be inline in the first place.
> >>
> >> do you mean pci_map_single==>dma_map_single==>gart_map_single?
> >
> >dma_map_single. pci_map_single is ok because it doesn't really
> >change anything.
>
> move dma_map_single from include/asm-x86_64/dma_mapping.h to
> arch/x86_64/pci-dma.c?
If yes, why? it's not exactly a big function:
static inline dma_addr_t
dma_map_single(struct device *hwdev, void *ptr, size_t size,
int direction)
{
BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction));
return dma_ops->map_single(hwdev, ptr, size, direction);
}
I'd rather we not make it out-of-line without a compelling (numerical)
reason.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists