lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706270059.33550.dtor@insightbb.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:59:32 -0400
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atkbd: cleanup only once

On Wednesday 27 June 2007 00:28, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:34:09AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 06:59, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > If you press ctrl+alt+del several times as kernel booting (before user level bootin), the kernel will oops. I found the ps2_command is called more than once, then the ps2dev->serio maybe NULL pointer.
> > > 
> > > 2.6.22-rc5 and 2.6.22-rc6 have same result.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > diff -upr linux/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c linux.new/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
> > > --- linux/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c	2007-06-27 10:38:37.000000000 +0000
> > > +++ linux.new/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c	2007-06-27 10:37:39.000000000 +0000
> > > @@ -795,6 +795,11 @@ static int atkbd_activate(struct atkbd *
> > >  
> > >  static void atkbd_cleanup(struct serio *serio)
> > >  {
> > > +	static int flag;
> > > +
> > > +	if(flag)
> > > +		return;
> > > +	flag = 1;
> > 
> > Unfortunately this will prevent atkbd from resetting keyboard on 2nd
> > suspend attempt. It will also not work if you have an active MUX and
> > have a couple of keyboards connected.
> > 
> > Greg, now that you removed rwsem from subsystem (and subsystem itself
> > for that matter) there is nothing as far as I can see that stops
> > several threads from running device_shutdown() simultaneously. I also
> > do not see what would isolate device probing and shutting them down
> > at the same time. Am I missing something?
> 
> There was never anything stopping that from happening before.  No driver
> core code was using that rwsem, so it wasn't protecting anything,
> despite people trying to use it as if it was :)
> 

It did protect device_shutdown() from itself, didn't it?

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ