[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6B8385EC-8CD4-4E8B-94EF-293A02A62189@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:53:51 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, david@...g.hm,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Userspace compiler support of "long long"
On Jun 27, 2007, at 23:57:54, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:30:52PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Then all 64-bit archs have:
>> typedef signed long __s64;
>> typedef unsigned long __u64;
>>
>> While all 32-bit archs have:
>> typedef signed long long __s64;
>> typedef unsigned long long __u64;
>
> include/asm-parisc/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
>
> For both 32 and 64-bit.
>
> include/asm-sh64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
> include/asm-x86_64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
>
> So that's three architectures that violate your first assertion.
Oh, ok, that makes it even easier to say this with certainty:
Changing the other 64-bit archs to use "long long" for their 64-bit
numbers will not cause additional warnings. I'm also almost certain
there are no architectures which use "long long" for 128-bit
integers. (Moreover, I can't find hardly anything which does 128-bit
integers at all).
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists