linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 007 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: vary maximum delegation limit based on RAM size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070628021551.GB20605@fieldses.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:15:52 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 007 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: vary maximum delegation limit based on RAM size

This code would benefit from a little more explanation.

Also, I screwed up the previous patch and forgot to delete a line, so the
calculation here is off; fix it.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
---

 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:52:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Please put yourself in the position of the reader who happens across this
> code and wonders why it is that way.
> 
> They could of course go hunt it out of the git repo but I do think it's
> quite a bit more reader-friendly to explain the thinking in code comments.
>

Yup, sorry about that.  Could you apply this?

--b.

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index fbbbcab..1b2657f 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3203,13 +3203,27 @@ get_nfs4_grace_period(void)
 	return max(user_lease_time, lease_time) * HZ;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Since the lifetime of a delegation isn't limited to that of an open, a
+ * client may quite reasonably hang on to a delegation as long as it has
+ * the inode cached.  This becomes an obvious problem the first time a
+ * client's inode cache approaches the size of the server's total memory.
+ *
+ * For now we avoid this problem by imposing a hard limit on the number
+ * of delegations, which varies according to the server's memory size.
+ */
 static void
 set_max_delegations(void)
 {
 	struct sysinfo sys;
 
 	si_meminfo(&sys);
-	sys.totalram *= sys.mem_unit;
+	/*
+	 * Allow at most 4 delegations per megabyte of RAM.  Quick
+	 * estimates suggest that in the worst case (where every delegation
+	 * is for a different inode), a delegation could take about 1.5K,
+	 * giving a worst case usage of about 6% of memory.
+	 */
 	sys.totalram >>= (18 - PAGE_SHIFT);
 	max_delegations = (unsigned int) sys.totalram;
 }
-- 
1.5.2.58.g98ee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/