[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4683D570.2090104@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:36:16 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding subroot information to /proc/mounts, or obtaining that
through other means
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> ... or, alternatively, add a subfield to the first field (which would
>>> entail escaping whatever separator we choose):
>>>
>>> /dev/md6 /export ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
>>> /dev/md6:/users/foo /home/foo ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
>>> /dev/md6:/users/bar /home/bar ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
>> Hell, no. The first field is in principle impossible to parse unless
>> you know the fs type.
>>
>> How about making a new file with sane format? From the very
>
> Well, what about /sysfs, with its one value per file rule?
>
There are two reasons not to do it that way:
- atomicity
- backwards compatibility
Of these, I would argue the former is the most important.
Additionally, I don't think sysfs has the ability to present different
structures on a per-process basis; keep in mind this isn't really
/proc/mounts, but really /proc/<pid>/mounts.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists