[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4683EF87.1050303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:27:35 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>, jamagallon@....com,
tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New format Intel microcode...
On 06/28/2007 10:12 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (while I work for Intel this is not an official Intel statement, but
> there is so much FUD going around now that I feel I need to at least
> point out a few things others "forget")
>> Slashdot carried an article this morning saying that an error in Intel
>> microcode was being fixed.
>
> don't just always believe everything you read on slashdot please
>
>> However, it listed only Windows related sites
>> for the "fix" download. Is this the same TLB issue? And are these really
>> fixes for Windows to flush the TLB properly the way Linux does?
>
> First of all, Linux has microcode updates as well. Some of the more
> hypish news-bulletins just conveniently "forgot" about this. Basically
> all distributions ship them, so users who use the distro update tools
> get these automatically. And the update mentioned has been shipping for
> a while (in version 1.17).
>
Fedora 6 has version 1.13
Fedora 7 also has 1.13
RHEL 5 has 1.15
Debian stable has 1.15 (9 Oct 2006)
Suse 10.1 has 1.13
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists