linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 007 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: vary maximum delegation limit based on RAM size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070627201035.dbbb84e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:10:35 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 007 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: vary maximum delegation limit
 based on RAM size

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:57:39 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > How's this?
> 
> Makes sense to me, thanks.  I guess fs/nsfd/nfssvc:nfsd_create_serv()
> should be similarly modified?  It calculates the size of per-nfsd-thread
> buffers used to hold requests, which will eventually be allocated with
> an alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL), and it bases the calculation on the same
> .totalram field from struct sysinfo.

Yup, it'd be better to use nr_free_buffer_pages() there too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/