linux-kernel - Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46842F7B.1010105@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:27 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	William D Waddington <william.waddington@...zmo.com>,
	Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0

On 06/28/2007 06:30 PM, Alan Cox wrote:

> Public domain is GPL compatible.

Would you happen to have an opinion on the attached? I don't so much need it 
or anything but I thought about submitting this once when I was working on 
some stuff locally. I didn't since I was expecting arguments that public 
domain is not so much a license, and how it becomes GPL anyway, ...

Stating that code which one intends to be in the public domain has "GPL and 
additional rights" is a bit of a travesty though.

Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>

Rene.

View attachment "public_domain.diff" of type "text/plain" (941 bytes)