[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1183069855.5889.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:30:55 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>, jamagallon@....com,
tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New format Intel microcode...
> I was mainly concerned with this being a new issue, and curious if
> Microsoft was calling an O/S bug a "microcode fix," given that the
> average Windows user doesn't know microcode from nanotech anyway. The
> non-answer from Arjan didn't answer either, and started by calling the
then ask questions?
Linux 2.6 is not affected.. what more is there to say? Regardless of
that as I said, Intel recommends always running the most current
microcode.
> I'd like the microcode update, some people elsewhere speculate that user
> level code could effect reliability if not security.
those "people" are speculating. Simple as that.
(oh and the microcode update is already there as I said... so what's the
problem?)
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists