[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070628224511.GA12447@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:45:11 -0400
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] Make check_signature() depend on CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:25:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> This completely bogus. readb() should be present on M68K, fix the
> platform to implement readb() for MMIO, even if your MMIO readb is a
> moveb instruction.
>
> check_signature is relevant for anything with MMIO space (for example you
> can legitimately want to check_signature a MAC68K Nubus ROM).
>
> S/390 is a bit of a special case as no S/390 usage of check_signature
> appears sane but equally it isn't used so you can stub it out.
This is a problem for UML too.
I have a patch in my tree, which basically stubs readb, waiting to see
how this is fixed for the other arches.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists