[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070628084003.GQ13886@enneenne.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:40:03 +0200
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:31:14AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:15 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > Do you think I should add these functions into my patch, even if I
> > cannot test it, or it's enought providing just the
> > compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() function?
>
> Probably best to put them in. That way, you make it easier for people to
Mmm... so I should provide new syscalls for _all_
architectures... gulp! :)
It could be acceptable, just for the first release, to provide the
support for x86 only?
In this manner we can have a first release of LinuxPPS in the main
line just for x86 and then me, or other people, may add support for
the several supported architectures.
> test. Ideally, you should also provide a simple program that other
> people can use to test it, preferably without needing hardware (or at
> least just a nullmodem cable and another test program at the other end
> of it).
I already have a basic testing program... I can add it into
Documentation/pps directory, can't I?
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@...dd.com
Embedded Systems giometti@...ux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists