linux-kernel - Re: Tasklet usage in the DRM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:04:30 -0400
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Michel Dänzer <michel@...gstengraphics.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Tasklet usage in the DRM

On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 09:09 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I just read an article on LWN's kernel page about plans to remove
> tasklets, and I thought I'd explain what the DRM is using tasklets for.
> Maybe there's other ways to satisfy the requirements equally well or
> even better.
> 
> 
> The i915 driver uses a tasklet to make sure a GL buffer swap blit or
> flip takes effect (or at least starts in the case of a blit) during the
> vertical blank period, to avoid tearing. I chose a tasklet for this
> purpose because:
> 
>       * The traditional method of the vertical blank interrupt waking up
>         the user process, which would then emit the buffer swap
>         commands, didn't even come close to avoiding tearing. So I
>         suspect a workqueue wouldn't cut it either.
>       * The processing of scheduled buffer swaps could potentially take
>         a long time, so doing it in hardirq context could cause high IRQ
>         latency.
>       * It requires holding the DRM lock, so the 'each tasklet can only
>         run once at a time' restriction is fine.
> 
> 
> I'm looking forward to any suggestions what to do with this in case
> tasklets disappear, and I'll gladly provide further clarification on the
> requirements.

If it hasn't been done someone with this hardware could test Steven's
patches to see if they do satisfy the requirements..

I think the most recent version was posted in this message,
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/27/289

Subject was "[RFC PATCH 0/8] Convert all tasklets to workqueues V3" if
people are subscribed to LKML ..

(Added Steven to the CC list)

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/