lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:04:22 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	bzolnier@...il.com, michal.kepien@...zta.onet.pl,
	linas@...tin.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x

The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- however,
badly implemented.  Make use of them despite it's probably only going to burden
the driver's code -- assuming both channels are always enabled by the HighPoint
BIOS anyway...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>

---
Michal, Linas, please verify the patch... :-)

 drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c |   20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * linux/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c		Version 1.05	Jun 26, 2007
+ * linux/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c		Version 1.06	Jun 27, 2007
  *
  * Copyright (C) 1999-2003		Andre Hedrick <andre@...ux-ide.org>
  * Portions Copyright (C) 2001	        Sun Microsystems, Inc.
@@ -1514,18 +1514,28 @@ static int __devinit init_setup_hpt366(s
 		goto init_single;
 
 	/*
-	 * HPT36x chips are single channel and
-	 * do not seem to have the channel enable bit...
+	 * HPT36x chips have one channel per function and have
+	 * both channel enable bits located differently and visible
+	 * to both functions -- really stupid design decision... :-(
+	 * Bit 4 is for the primary channel, bit 5 for the secondary.
 	 */
 	d->channels = 1;
-	d->enablebits[0].reg = 0;
+	d->enablebits[0].mask = d->enablebits[0].val = 0x10;
 
 	if ((dev2 = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, dev->devfn + 1)) != NULL) {
-	  	u8  pin1 = 0, pin2 = 0;
+	  	u8  mcr1 = 0, pin1 = 0, pin2 = 0;
 		int ret;
 
 		pci_set_drvdata(dev2, info[rev]);
 
+		/*
+		 * Now we'll have to force both channels enabled if
+		 * at least one of them has been enabled by BIOS...
+		 */
+		pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x50, &mcr1);
+		if (mcr1 & 0x30)
+			pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x50, mcr1 | 0x30);
+
 		pci_read_config_byte(dev,  PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin1);
 		pci_read_config_byte(dev2, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin2);
 		if (pin1 != pin2 && dev->irq == dev2->irq) {

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ