[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706290202480.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:06:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] Make check_signature() depend on CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > check_signature is relevant for anything with MMIO space (for example you
> > > can legitimately want to check_signature a MAC68K Nubus ROM).
> >
> > A generic check_signature() is a little difficult if we have separate io
> > functions for every bus.
>
> Does M68K implement iomap() and pci_iomap and friends yet ?
How is that related?
> check_signature has fairly few users so moving to be iomap based wouldn't
> be hard if that was a problem. The other option would seem to be
> bus->check_signature() ?
IMO the first question would be whether that function is really this
important. We can also just leave it as a PCI/ISA template and other bus
specific header can implement when necessary.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists