[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070629223505.GB6732@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:35:05 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.
Hi!
> > > ALIGN
> > > .align 4096
> > > @@ -31,6 +46,11 @@ wakeup_code:
> > > movw %cs, %ax
> > > movw %ax, %ds # Make ds:0 point to wakeup_start
> > > movw %ax, %ss
> > > +
> > > + testl $1, beep_flags - wakeup_code
> > > + jz 1f
> > > + BEEP
> > > +1:
> >
> > Can we rename/reuse existing flag variable?
>
> Sorry, but I can't resist the opportunity to say "Send a patch!" :)
>
> Seriously, though, I'd prefer not to. If we rename that acpi video flags
> variable (I assume this is what you're thinking of), we only create cause for
> confusion. A variable should for debugging or for controlling quirks, not for
> both at the same time.
Cause for confusion? We are currently using 2 bits of that variable,
and we want to add one more bit. I seriously doubt that can confuse
anyone.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists