[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706282119330.11676@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: hugh@...itas.com, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Containment measures for slab objects on scatter gather
lists
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > Still a better solution would be to not use the slab allocator at all for
> > the objects that are used to send commands to the devices. These are not
> > permanent and grabbing a page from the pcp lists and putting it back is
> > likely as fast as performing a kmalloc.
>
> Jens Axboe wants to get references to the page structs behind
> kmalloc() allocated pages in his networking splice work.
You can get such a reference and then the slab page will be in limbo if
all objects are freed until that reference is given up. The reference
method is also use by kmem_cache_vacate() (but that is slab internal).
> We could make a special allocator in the networking that carves
> chunks out of pages but I'm sure you'll find that about as stupid
> and wasteful as I do :-)
Well then I guess this containment patch is as good as we can get.
It makes sure that things do not get out of hand.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists