linux-kernel - Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4684C91B.5060203@ums.usu.ru>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:55:55 +0600
From:	"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@....usu.ru>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>
Cc:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, rob@...dley.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are
> stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want
> to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for 
> the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about
> moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them sitting in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
> for a few months at least.)

If this helps, here is the version information.

Stable LFS (version 6.2, released on August 3, 2006) tells users to download 
man-pages 2.34 (two releases old at that time). LFS-6.3 is expected to be 
released in two months or so, thus a one-year period before moving tarballs 
to "Old" should be enough even for stable LFS books (and if we agree on 
that, I'll close http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2037 as invalid).

Thanks for cooperation.

-- 
Alexander E. Patrakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/