linux-kernel - Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070630122932.GA10432@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:29:32 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:	schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	harald@...gtun.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 02:02:16PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> 
> > Jörg,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:27 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and
> > > > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite.
> > > >
> > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have
> > > > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you
> > > > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_
> > > > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know.
> > > 
> > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving.
> > > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason.
> >
> > Attacking people who suggest to you they *may* have noticed an anomaly is
> > not polite at all, childish at best, and counter-productive in any case.
> 
> Well, then please write this to the person who did attack me for no reason!

I illustrated what looked like to be his reason and it was valid here too,
and you even removed the proofs on purpose of not commenting.

> What he did is typical trollish behavior, as he tried to turn a technical
> based discussion into a flame war for no reason.

Oh yes, of course... Any advice to make mail communication better for
everyone on a mailing list surely is trolling and trying to bring anything
into a flame war... I am always amused by the contents of your rants.

I've never known if you sometimes believe what you say, but it's not my
problem anyway. Maybe having the last word by boring people make you feel
like you're right. But if you cannot openly communicate with people on
mailing lists, please first do not open discussions on subjects which
are known to derivate into flame wars. This month has been particularly
loaded with non-productive contents already.

> Jörg
[advertisements removed]

Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/