[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706302230.19040.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:30:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.
Hi,
On Saturday, 30 June 2007 12:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Sorry, but I can't resist the opportunity to say "Send a patch!" :)
> > > >
> > > > Seriously, though, I'd prefer not to. If we rename that acpi video flags
> > > > variable (I assume this is what you're thinking of), we only create cause for
> > > > confusion. A variable should for debugging or for controlling quirks, not for
> > > > both at the same time.
> > >
> > > Cause for confusion? We are currently using 2 bits of that variable,
> > > and we want to add one more bit. I seriously doubt that can confuse
> > > anyone.
> >
> > Well, indeed it would be more elegant to rename the existing flags variable
> > and use another bit out of it, but I personally don't think it's _that_
> > important. At least, I don't think we should block the patch
> > because of that.
>
> It is not _that_ important.
>
> > BTW, has anyone confirmed that it works on i386?
>
> If you have patch somewhere nearby, I can test it on i386 and make it
> use just one flags variable.
http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.22-rc6/patches/28-Optional-Beeping-During-Resume-From-RAM.patch
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists