linux-kernel - [PATCH][ISDN][resend] fix possible NULL deref on low memory condition in capidrv.c::send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200707010101.12527.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2007 01:01:12 +0200
From:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, Carsten Paeth <calle@...le.de>,
	Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>,
	Kai Germaschewski <kai.germaschewski@....de>,
	Kai Germaschewski <kai@...maschewski.name>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH][ISDN][resend] fix possible NULL deref on low memory condition in capidrv.c::send_message()

(first send: Monday 25 June 2007, resending due to no response)


If we fail to allocate an skb in 
drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c::send_message(), then we'll end up 
dereferencing a NULL pointer.
Since out of memory conditions are not unheard of, I believe it 
is better to print a error message and just return rather than 
bring down the whole kernel. 
Sure, doing this may upset some application, but that's still 
better than crashing the whole system.

(ps. please Cc me on replies from the isdn4linux list since I'm not subscribed 
 there)


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
---

 drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c b/drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c
index 23b6f7b..476012b 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c
@@ -506,9 +506,14 @@ static void send_message(capidrv_contr * card, _cmsg * 
cmsg)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	size_t len;
+
 	capi_cmsg2message(cmsg, cmsg->buf);
 	len = CAPIMSG_LEN(cmsg->buf);
 	skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!skb) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "capidrv::send_message: can't allocate mem\n");
+		return;
+	}
 	memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), cmsg->buf, len);
 	if (capi20_put_message(&global.ap, skb) != CAPI_NOERROR)
 		kfree_skb(skb);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/