linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070630102601.GA24044@localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:26:01 +0300
From:	Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
To:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Cc:	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:22:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > Right, however many patches don't map to bug reports and don't 
> > need the heavy use of BTS. This suggestion is mainly for the 
> > improvement of peer review concerning code changes submitted 
> > by people who are not the maintainers.
> 
> Unfortunately you didn't listen, OK, just two messages:
> 
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/544898>
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/545112>
> 
> As you will see, nobody cares about comprehensive
> patches/tests/bugs/testers/developers *tracking* system.
> 
> And don't limit yourself to fast conclusions. Thanks.

I am not proposing a comprehensive tracking system. I think
you are taking my intentions quite off-course.

-- 
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/